| Crop Management & Environ- mental Effects on Rice Milling Quality & Yield - 2009
|
|
|---|---|
|
Project Leader and Principal Investigators Randall "Cass" Mutters, UC Cooperative Extension farm advisor, Butte CountyJames Thompson, extension specialist, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Enginering, UC Davis Luis Espino, UC Cooperative Extension farm advisor, Colusa County
|
This is the seventh year of a project examining how crop management
decisions and field moisture conditions affect rice milling quality and
yield. In 2009 the focus of the project broadened its objectives to include
a survey of storage-related insects and the potential for water savings with
accelerated field draining.
Field and laboratory experiments
Field preparation, fertility and pest management followed standard Rice Experiment Station (RES) practices. The experiment was planted June 5. Seeds were dry planted at a rate of 150 pounds/acre. Irrigation water was brought to a depth of three to four inches during germination and seed establishment. A low fertilization rate was used because of the late planting date. Each variety was subjected to four different drain dates: 12, 16, 20, and 24 days after 50% heading. Fifty percent heading occurred September 1 for M-202, September 2 for M-205, and August 29 for M-206. All basins were harvested on October 22, 26, 29, and November 4.
In addition to the RES experiment, samples of M-202, M-205, and M-206 were collected from statewide variety trials near Butte City and Natomas. These plots were harvested at several dates to obtain a range of harvest moisture content. Samples were threshed, dried, and evaluated with the same procedure used at RES. Within each variety, the rate of kernel drying below 25% moisture content was similar at all drain dates. The rate of moisture loss across varieties averaged 0.8% per day. M-206 showed the least variability in kernel moisture content in relation to drain dates. Surprisingly, drain date did not affect the rate of kernel dry down or the time required to reach harvestable moisture content. Overall, yields were low, presumably in response to the late planting and the modest amounts of fertilizer applied. The yield of M-206 proved to be the least sensitive to delayed planting. On the whole, yields increased as the drain date was delayed. There was no apparent “leveling off” of the yield trends, suggesting that optimal drain date for maximum yield may be longer than 24 days after heading. Based on this year’s results – and those from previous years’ research – draining is not advised sooner than 20 days after heading. To varying degrees, total rice yield and head rice yield of all varieties increased with later drain dates. Total rice yields of M-202 and M-206 were similar and less affected by early drain dates than M-205. Head rice yield trended higher at later drain dates for all varieties.
The productivity of the three test varieties may be adversely affected by the loss of flooded conditions. Yield and grain quality are compromised when the soil transitions from an anaerobic to an aerobic state. Preliminary results from trials at the RES in 2009, where rice was grown under well-watered but non-flooded conditions, resulted in delayed development and reduced yield. Prior years’ research indicated that M-205 and M-206 could be drained at 20 days after heading while maintaining quality and yield. In contrast, 2009 results suggest that draining 24 days after heading or longer would be best. The estimated end-of-season average water use is about a half inch per day. Thus, further testing is necessary to more accurately calculate potential water savings from earlier drain times. Storage insect monitoringTwo rice storage facilities were surveyed for the presence of seasonal insects that could potentially affect rice quality. In Richvale a flat bed storage warehouse containing 20 million pounds of rough rice was surveyed. In Arbuckle, a flat bed storage warehouse with 45.5 million pounds of rough rice and a silo containing 8 million pounds of rough rice was surveyed. Three types of traps were used: pheromone traps, probe traps, and dome traps. Seventeen species were identified. Two are internal feeders, four external feeders, five feed on fungi, two feed on grain dust or fungi, and one is predaceous. The most abundant insect in the warehouses was the Angoumois grain moth, caught in the pheromone and probe traps. In the silo the red flour beetle, an important pest of stored grains, was the most abundant. The lesser grain borer, a severe pest of stored rice, was found at relatively low densities in all locations. Other insects collected are not considered important pests of stored rice or feed on fungi developing on the grain. Their presence may indicate that storage conditions need to be improved.
|