|



Project Leader and Principal UC
Investigators
John B. Dobie,
UC Davis
John R.
Goss
Brian
Horsfield
George E.
Miller, Jr.
----------------
Evaluating and Improving Rice Harvest Equipment and Systems
George E.
Miller, Jr., UC Davis
Robert A.
Kepner
John R.
Goss
John B.
Dobie
John F.
Williams
K.E.
Mueller
|
Objective
Develop economical systems of crop residue management which enhance
environmental quality
Our residue management research, cooperatively planned and conducted with
the California Air Resources Board and the Solid Waste Management Board, has
clearly demonstrated to the public our long-term interest in maintaining
good environmental conditions. This research has enabled us to retain field
burning as a management tool to control stem rot and has provided
information on other residue management practices.
 |
|
The now widely-used strip, into-the-wind firing method of burning rice
fields to con trol stem rot disease organisms and reduce straw to
manageable levels was developed by UCD agricultural engineers George Miller, John Goss and Jim Thompson. This
procedure reduces atmospheric emissions by 50 to 90 percent. |
 |
|
Most studies on utilizing rice straw for fuel or
livestock feed have concentrated on ways to gather, transport, and
stockpile straw. At current costs, fuels such as coal have proved to be
far more economical energy sources than straw delivered to point of use. UCD and USDA scientists have
found that rice straw treated with sodium hydroxide or ammonium compounds
becomes a useable roughage for sheep, beef and dairy cattle. Research has
recently been funded to attempt to convert rice straw into sugar syrup. |
 |
|
Many systems of incorporating straw into the soil
were tried by UCD
agricultural engineers. Chopping straw into 11/2- to 4-inch lengths before
incorporation facilitated the process and speeded decomposition. Complete
fall soil incorporation of rice straw reduces stem rot buildup but is not as
effective as burning. The studies by Drs. Robert A. Kepner and John B. Dobie
showed that the best of incorporation methods may cost up to 150 times more
than disposing of straw by open field burning. |
|