| Disease Control-82
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
Project Leader and Principal UC Investigators R.K. Webster, Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis |
The long-range objectives of the disease control project are to
determine the occurrence, nature, and control of
rice diseases in California.
Diseases are identified and their spread and
severity are determined.
This information provides the basis for finding
control methods by
manipulating cultural practices, including residue management, the
development of resistant varieties, and possible use of chemicals. The two
principal rice diseases in California are stem rot and sheath blight.Sheath Blight
Sheath blight disease has been known in California since the late 1960s. Its incidence and severity has increased significantly in the past few years. The increase coincides with the introduction and widespread use of the high yielding short-statured varieties. The disease occurs throughout California's rice growing area. The causal organism has been identified as Rhizoctonia oryzae sativae. Early varieties of rice appear to be affected more than late varieties, and the disease is more severe where excess nitrogen fertilizer is used. Tilt®, a newly developed fungicide, shows considerable potential for control of sheath blight. Registration is pending, but the FDA permitted its use on rice in the southern states during the 1982 season. Plant resistance to sheath blight has been identified in wild species of Oryzae, and the prospect of transferring it to cultivated rice is promising. Improvements are being made in methods used to determine disease severity. These methods are important for use in determining loss, control measures, and for evaluating breeding lines. chemically treated plots. Nine lines selected for greatest tolerance averaged only 7.4 percent reduction in yield from water weevil. Effects of Various Straw Removal and Rice Harvesting MethodsA three-year study has been completed on disease levels of sheath blight and stem rot following various harvesting and straw removal procedures. Treatments were burning, soil incorporation of the straw, and harvesting and removal of the straw from the field. Conclusions from these studies are as follows:
|
|